Figure 03 vs XPeng IRON
Generated from the registry · revision 2026-09-26 · openness out of 100
Figure 03 is 6 cm shorter (172 vs 178 cm) and 9 kg lighter (61 vs 70 kg) than XPeng IRON. Both score 0/100 on openness. Availability for both: not for sale.
01
Side by side
■ rows differ| Field | Figure AIFigure 03 | XPengXPeng IRON | Δ first − second |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Maker (differs) | Figure AI | XPeng | |
| Class | Humanoid | Humanoid | |
| Status (differs) | Active | Announced | |
| Availability | Not for sale | Not for sale | |
| Country (differs) | United States | China | |
| Year (differs) | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Specifications | |||
| Height (differs) | 172cm | 178cm | −6 cm (-3%) |
| Mass (differs) | 61kg | 70kg | −9 kg (-13%) |
| Degrees of freedom | 35 | —unsourced | |
| Payload | 20kg | —unsourced | |
| Top speed | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Runtime | 300min | —unsourced | |
| Battery capacity | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Price | Not for sale | Not for sale | |
| Actuators | Electric; 2x faster with improved torque density vs F.02 | —unsourced | |
| Compute (differs) | Helix VLA onboard | 3x XPeng Turing AI chips, 2,250 TOPS | |
| Sensors | Redesigned cameras (2x frame rate, 60% wider FOV), palm cameras, fingertip tactile sensors (~3 g) | —unsourced | |
| Openness and provenance | |||
| Openness bar | |||
| Openness score | 0/ 100 | 0/ 100 | = |
| CAD (25) | not public | not public | |
| Bill of materials (20) | not public | not public | |
| Sim model (URDF/MJCF) (20) | not public | not public | |
| Firmware (15) | not public | not public | |
| Software (10) | not public | not public | |
| Trained policies (10) | not public | not public | |
| Verification level | L0 | L0 | |
| Sources | 2 | 2 | |
| Last checked | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-24 | |
A dash is an unsourced figure, not zero. Sources for each robot are listed on its spec sheet: Figure 03, XPeng IRON.
02