Compare humanoids
Pick two to four robots. Every pair also has its own permanent page, 1,326 in total, generated from the same records.
01
Pick robots
52 humanoidsNEO is 35 cm taller (165 vs 130 cm) and 3 kg lighter (30 vs 33 kg) than AgiBot Lingxi X1. NEO has 24.5 kg more rated payload (25 vs 0.5 kg) than AgiBot Lingxi X1. Openness score: NEO 0, AgiBot Lingxi X1 85 (of 100); only AgiBot Lingxi X1 publishes CAD, BOM, SIM, SW and POL. Availability: NEO preorder, AgiBot Lingxi X1 diy build.
| Field | 1X Technologies1X NEO | AgiBot (Zhiyuan Robotics)AgiBot Lingxi X1 | Δ first − second |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Maker (differs) | 1X Technologies | AgiBot (Zhiyuan Robotics) | |
| Class | Humanoid | Humanoid | |
| Status (differs) | Announced | Active | |
| Availability (differs) | Preorder | DIY build | |
| Country (differs) | United States | China | |
| Year | 2024 | 2024 | |
| Specifications | |||
| Height (differs) | 165cm | 130cm | +35 cm (+27%) |
| Mass (differs) | 30kg | 33kg | −3 kg (-9%) |
| Degrees of freedom | —unsourced | 31 | |
| Payload (differs) | 25kg | 0.5kg | +24.5 kg (+4900%) |
| Top speed | —unsourced | 1m/s | |
| Runtime (differs) | 240min | 120min | +120 min (+100%) |
| Battery capacity | 842Wh | —unsourced | |
| Price | 20,000USD | —unsourced | |
| Actuators (differs) | 22-DOF hands | AgiBot PowerFlow joint modules (R86-2, R86-3, R52, L28) | |
| Compute | NVIDIA Jetson Thor | —unsourced | |
| Sensors | —unsourced | —unsourced | |
| Openness and provenance | |||
| Openness bar | |||
| Openness score (differs) | 0/ 100 | 85/ 100 | −85 |
| CAD (25) (differs) | not public | public | |
| Bill of materials (20) (differs) | not public | public | |
| Sim model (URDF/MJCF) (20) (differs) | not public | public | |
| Firmware (15) | not public | not public | |
| Software (10) (differs) | not public | public | |
| Trained policies (10) (differs) | not public | public | |
| Verification level (differs) | L0 | L1 | |
| Sources (differs) | 4 | 6 | |
| Last checked (differs) | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-25 | |
03
Best-documented pairs
most sourced fields on both sidesHyperspawn DropbearvsPollen Reachy 211fHyperspawn DropbearvsKepler Forerunner K2 "Bumblebee"11fHyperspawn DropbearvsPUDU D911fKepler Forerunner K2 "Bumblebee"vsPollen Reachy 211fPollen Reachy 2vsPUDU D911fKepler Forerunner K2 "Bumblebee"vsPUDU D911fHyperspawn DropbearvsRainbow Robotics RB-Y110fHyperspawn DropbearvsUnitree G110fRainbow Robotics RB-Y1vsUnitree G110fEngineAI PM01vsHyperspawn Dropbear10fEngineAI PM01vsRainbow Robotics RB-Y110fEngineAI PM01vsUnitree G110fHyperspawn DropbearvsK-Scale K-Bot10fHyperspawn DropbearvsUnitree H1-210fK-Scale K-BotvsRainbow Robotics RB-Y110fK-Scale K-BotvsUnitree G110fPollen Reachy 2vsRainbow Robotics RB-Y110fPollen Reachy 2vsUnitree G110fRainbow Robotics RB-Y1vsUnitree H1-210fUnitree G1vsUnitree H1-210fEngineAI PM01vsK-Scale K-Bot10fEngineAI PM01vsPollen Reachy 210fEngineAI PM01vsUnitree H1-210fFigure 02vsHyperspawn Dropbear10f